Click here to Skip Navigation

The mystery of the attendee

Think about the relationship between the words "employer" and "employee". This is the relationship that I think of as being the natural one - the employee is employed by the employer.

It follows the French pattern, because the "e" with an accent (to show that it is pronounced as a separate syllable) is common as an ending on the past participle - so the French employé means "employed". The payee in a banking transaction gets paid and an addressee is addressed, so they get something sent to them.

Now take the word "attendee". Why did this one go wrong? Why don't we use the word "attender", which is what it means? An attendee is someone who attends something, not someone who is attended. Do you know of any other words that have "gone wrong" like attendee?

A recent addition to the language is the word "mentee". This is odd for a different reason. A mentor is not someone who ments. If mentors were called advisers, the people they advised would be advisees. Perhaps we will start talking about menting each other and having menting sessions. Why not?

Writing to non-native speakers of English | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

Writing to non-native speakers of English

I regularly meet people whose first language is English, who have no serious knowledge of any other language and yet have to communicate in writing with people all over the world.

It is hard for them to imagine the difficulties of working in one's second (or third) language. How could they know how to use English in a foreigner-friendly way?
British English and international (or world) English are not the same. Indeed, there are undoubtedly hundreds of identifiable Englishes. I am not an expert on that, although there is plenty of interesting information available on the subject.

We cannot expect and would not advise those monolingual communicators to use Euro-English or Afro-English, so what should they do?

I have personal experience of being the only first-language English person at a European sales conference. This was many years ago, but the problem has changed only in scale rather than in nature since then. When I did not understand a word a presenter used, I asked what it meant. This amused the assembled company who had not asked the same question because there was too much else that they had not understood. They made the reasonable, but mistaken, assumption that as a native English speaker I understood every word. One of the words in question was "Horeca". This meant, apparently, hotels, restaurants and cafes - in other words the market into which we were trying to sell lighting products. It was not a term that we used in the UK but the conference hosts assumed it to be international.

I tell this story because it illustrates how difficult it is for people who are based primarily in one country to know which expressions their readers from another country will understand. I have used the word "hassle" in the company of public sector staff in the Middle East and found that several of them had not come across it.

I believe that we first-language English speakers have been born with a massive advantage and that we should not be arrogant. We should make serious efforts to make ourselves understood in an international way when the occasion requires it, rather than expecting the world to guess at our linguistic peculiarities. If we can do this while retaining some individual style, that is a bonus. Above all let us try to be easy to understand.
If this little tale reminds you of personal experiences, please share them. I would love to hear of expressions you have confused people with - or been confused by. A collection of anecdotes could help me to add content to Grammar to Go which will help business people to communicate with their overseas colleagues.

Plus and Minus | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

Plus and Minus

Would you spell pluses and minuses this way?

A colleague raised this question the other day and I found myself thinking further about it after I had answered quickly. First of all, he asked whether "plus" and "minus" are nouns nowadays? I think there is no doubt that they are. You hear people saying things like "A plus of the conference centre is the big car park, but the distance from any form of public transport is a distinct minus".

So, the words are being used as nouns. Once they are being spoken, they will be written and probably used in the plural. So we need to know how to spell pluses/plusses and minuses/minusses. "Minuses" seems to me to be quite clear. It rhymes with sinuses not with blunderbusses, and the emphasis is on the first syllable so there is no rule or precedent to suggest that it should be spelt otherwise.

What about plusses though? Pluses looks to me as though it should rhyme with abuses - and there are plenty of people out there (including BBC Sport) spelling it with a double "s". But then there is "buses". I don't know about you, but I have so far failed to think of any other single syllable words ending in a single "s". So, my preference is for pluses and minuses - after all, it seems tidier to follow the same rule for both unless there is a good reason not to.

Little nerdish note: bus comes from the Latin "omnibus" which means "for everyone". We have shortened it to "bus" which is probably why there are not many words like it.

Inaccessible language hides the truth | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

Inaccessible language hides the truth

There's one surer way of hiding an uncomfortable truth than publishing it on the same day as a news bombshell - that is writing it in very long, abstract words and long sentences. The Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills seems particularly gifted in this art.

The Independent today quotes a sentence from the department's annual report: "An overarching national improvement strategy will drive up quality and performance underpinned by specific plans for strategically significant areas of activity, such as workforce and technology". Apparently this is part of a strategy to hide their lack of a strategy.  Quite successful I should say - I for one will not be clamouring for a copy of the annual report so that I can read the rest.

The good news is that the department has been firmly told by MPs that next year its must use "terminology appropriate to its function".  Well I do hope those MPs give them a hand with their plain English.

If you run the offending sentence through the MS Word grammar checker, you will find that it has 26 words and a Flesch-Kincaid grade level of about 21.  That makes it significantly harder to read than Florida life insurance policies.  For more information on this readability gauge, have a look at the Wikipedia article.

Apostrophe Ban | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

Apostrophe Ban

Good for Birmingham City Council!

I find it extraordinary that apostrophes stir up so much emotion.  I am known to some people as the apostrophe lady, but then that's my job.  To my knowledge, at least three papers yesterday picked up and published the story that Birmingham City Council is fed up with people wanting to change King's Road to Kings Road and back again, so it has decided to make a clear decision to leave all apostrophes out of its signage from now onwards.

Shock horror! Bad example to children!  Dumbing down! To read some comments, you would think we had agreed to phonetic spelling in school text books.

In my opinion this is a good example of practical common sense.  It will save  money and confuse nobody.  Much better to have no apostrophes than to have them in the wrong places - and not only on street signs.

 

Darwin and Reader-Focused Writing | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

Darwin and Reader-Focused Writing

Charles Darwin's success at publicising his ideas on natural selection is an example for us all.

I was reading about Charles Darwin yesterday, and how he got his ideas over to a nation that was by no means guaranteed to be receptive to them. His success has a message for us all - know your target audience.

He started developing his ideas twenty years before publishing his book and restricted his writing on the subject to a few articles for scientific journals. One of several reasons for this was that he knew his God-fearing public (including his wife) and preferred not to be the focus of an angry storm of protest. His joint paper with Alfred Wallace to the Linnean Society was called: "On the Tendency of Species to form Varieties; and on the Perpetuation of Varieties and Species by Natural Means of Selection". It made no impact at all.

A year later he published "On the Origin of Species", a short book which explains the succinctly named notion of "natural selection". He consciously avoided the term "evolution" because of the dangerous associations with Biblical debate he knew it would have. He wrote in clear, straightforward English (rather quaint 19th century English, reasonably enough) which is very readable even today. The first edition sold out on the day of publication and the ideas immediately led to international debate. Why? First, Darwin considered his audience - waited for them to be receptive and used language they would understand and respond well to. Second, he chose a succinct and memorable title.

 

Me, myself and I | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

Me, myself and I

When should you say I and when should it be me? I or me?

This is an example of dozens of similar articles that you can access as a subscriber to Grammar to Go

Rule 1: If you are taking the action the sentence describes, say "I". Otherwise, it's "me".

Right: I am typing (I am the subject - the active person or thing)
Right: My client wrote to me (the client is active and I am on the receiving end, so "me" is correct)

Rule 2. If there's another person involved, so you want to say "Adam and ..." it makes NO difference. Use I or me as you would have without Adam.

Right: Martha and I designed and built the set in a week.
Wrong: Me and Martha designed the set
Wrong: They awarded Martha and I the first prize.

Rule 3: Only say "myself" when you are referring back to "I" for emphasis.

Right: I know it went on Thursday, I posted it myself.
Wrong: Please send the completed form to myself (should be "me")

 

 

Will they read your CV? | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

Will they read your CV?

Any error, however apparently trivial, can prevent your CV from making it to the short-list

You probably put a great deal of effort into writing your CV so that it gets all your greatest achievements in front of the selection panel. Of course that's important, but please don't forget the presentation and the accuracy of the writing. People who make short-lists have one objective - to make the list short. A spelling mistake or a grammatical error provides them with an excuse to put your CV in the bin regardless of how perfect you were for the position.

You must check these:

Spelling

Use the spellchecker but do not rely on it. It doesn't know which is which of "principle" and "principal" and it won't notice if you write "form" when you meant "from" because they are both real words. After running the spellchecker, print your CV out, sit down in a quiet place with an old fashioned dictionary and look at every single word you wrote. If you are in any doubt about a word, look it up. It is boring, but really worth it.

Above all, triple check the name of the organisation you are applying to, and any individuals within it.

Punctuation

• Keep sentences to an average of a line and half, or about 20 words.*
• Use bullet points in short lists - seven or fewer in a group - and punctuate them how you like, but consistently.
• Do not use exclamation marks.
• If you use brackets or quotes, remember to close them.

Capital letters

Use them consistently. The word "company" doesn't need a capital letter unless you are referring to a company name as in "Parker and Company Ltd". However, there is plenty of uncertainty about how to use capitals so the most important thing is to decide what you are going to do and stick to it. Writing "Company" with a capital C is not a huge sin, but changing your mind from one line to the next makes it look as if you couldn't be bothered to check.

These will make your CV easy to read (and therefore popular):

Use short sections and sub-headings

No more than seven lines to a paragraph is a good rule of thumb. Rather than one big block of text headed "Experience", you could divide it up to help the reader. Do "2002-4" and "2004-6" help them, or would they find it more useful to see sections called: "customer facing", "administrative" and "project management"?

Keep to one typeface and not too many sizes.

Resist the urge to use underlining and different fonts for emphasis. A better approach is to leave out the less important points. Choose a simple font such as Arial that all printers and word processors can recognise. A good size is 11pt or 12pt.


* Word will calculate your average sentence length if you have the "show readability statistics" box ticked under the spelling and grammar options.

 

Learned or learnt? | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

Learned or learnt?

Does it matter how you spell these words?

A customer I was demonstrating Grammar to Go to last week asked this question, and I had to admit that the answer was neither on the site nor in my head. So, true to my word I have now looked it up and here is the answer:

You can always choose.

There is no difference except in the following example:
"Learned" with two syllables so it sounds like "learn-id" as in "my learned friend" is always spelt (spelled?) with a "d".

Spelt or spelled?

American English uses "spelled" more often, and British English prefers "spelt". Sometimes British users emphasise the word by using the "ed" version, as in
"I spelled it out to her letter by letter to make sure she got it right".

So, if you like a simple life, stick to a "t" at all times.

 

 

Creative spelling from a soldier | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

Creative spelling from a soldier

Sometimes words are not spelt in the best way to convey their meaning. This soldier made at least two of them more interesting.

In today's Independent, there was a heartbreaking letter written by a soldier to his family to be delivered to them if he died. He showed courage and maturity extraordinary for his age - 18, and realised how important this letter would be in helping his parents and brothers to deal with his death.

His spelling, like Winnie the Pooh's, was a bit wobbly, but the poor guy probably never imagined in his wildest dreams that this letter would be read by so many people he had never met.

Two of the words he used made me see them with new eyes.  He said "we wont mention that to any ‘higherarcy'". Does this not convey much more imaginatively the meaning to him of hierarchy than the word spelled correctly would have done? I like that very much.

The other phrase I particularly enjoyed was "damn right determination". I don't know whether this young soldier was having a laugh - I hope so. I am definitely going to borrow that phrase which is, after all, not a cliché (yet) but is so strong and expressive.

The death of such a young soldier is a terrible thing, but this one left a legacy that will be treasured by more people than he realised.

 

Help me with examples of ambiguity | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

Help me with examples of ambiguity

Sentences can be hard to read, confusing or ambiguous for many reasons. I am building a list of points to watch out for that I can share with students and users of Grammar to Go. Please send me your examples so that we can identify some words and constructions to watch out for.

I want to build a set of sentences that demonstrates the types of words and constructions that lead to lack of clarity. This is because I often need to think of an example of an unclear or ambiguous sentence to help a student to see what I mean. It is a very difficult thing to do on the spot, so I would like your help to build up a set of examples that I can call upon. I will publish them here with notes on why they are difficult to read.

Let me make my motivation clear. I am not naming and shaming for fun because we all make mistakes. Examples are likely to come from the press because it's what we all read, and I am well aware that journalists write under extreme time pressure. So am not saying: "oh look, even professional journalists can't write properly". I am also not looking for grammatical and typing errors - I would be swamped with submissions and it would be quite boring.

I am looking for sentences you have read more than once because the meaning was not clear to you. If you decide that the sentence is genuinely ambiguous, please send it to me. In other words, if you decide that there are alternative ways of reading the sentence and that your decision about what the writer meant is based more on your experience of the world than on the sequence of words.

Please copy your sentences and add them as comments to this blog, or if you find them online, send me a link.

Here is one to get you thinking - and I look forward to hearing from you.

In the Independent this morning, 27 July 09

How the Forces Finally learnt to take pride

It was even harder when she was posted recently to the multi-national Eufor offices in Sarajevo to work with personnel from other militaries, such as the Americans, who do not accept openly gay servicemen or women as well as less-liberal-thinking locals.

This is a 44 word sentence so it was heading for trouble anyway. My difficulty is with the last part, starting with "as well as". The implication of this sentence could be:
a) that the Americans are less tolerant of gay servicemen and women than even the less-liberal-thinking locals are; or
b) that the woman in question found it hard to work with American service personnel and also with locals.

My hunch is that the answer is (b). But if that is the case, the sentence is not well punctuated. If it is (a), the sentence is well punctuated but a bit confusing because "less-liberal-thinking" seems to go against the expected emphasis.

 

Hidden Gems in the Grammar Checker | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

Hidden Gems in the Grammar Checker

If you dig around in your word processor, you can find some amazing things at the back of the cupboard - if you know what to do with them.

I don't know if this is as new to you as it was to me - but I have discovered something genuinely useful in the grammar checker's tools. I have always been a bit sniffy about them on the basis that you seemed to need to understand grammatical terms to be able to act on its advice - and if you understood the terms, you probably didn't need the advice.

For example, what use is "passive, consider revising" if you don't know what the passive is?

Anyway, go into the grammar checker's toolkit and tick the box called "readability statistics", which is not ticked by default. Here's how:

Word 97-2003

Tools/options/spelling & grammar gives you a page of tick boxes. Readability statistics is the last one.

Word 2007

Click on the office button; go to "Word Options" right down at the bottom of the box; click on "proofing" third down on the left; readability statistics is three-quarters of the way down the page.

Now, when you run the spellchecker right through your document you will find some gems. The first one is that you find out your average sentence length, which is quite useful (anything over 20 is hard to read). The real surprise to me though was the Flesch reading ease index. A client of mine encouraged me to look into it - so I discovered its value. If you check it out on Wikipedia you get the full explanation, but the short version is that a high score is easier to read than a low score - and it really works. An article from the Sun got 62, the Financial Times and the Independent both got scores in the 40s, a poorly written report got 34 and some particularly long-winded text in a random website got no points at all.

In other words, it can be a genuine indicator of how accessible your writing is. Personally, I think reports should be in the 40s and web content should be higher. If you play with this, let me know what you discover.

This blog gets 69.5

Let me know what you think of this tool, and any others you come across in the process.

 

Rescue a word today! | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

Rescue a word today!

New words make our language richer, or most of them do. But what about the ones we are losing? Howard Jacobson of the Independent makes the case for rescuing some endangered words.

People I talk to about my love of the English language often assume that I will disapprove of newly coined words.

Actually, no. One of the delights of our language is that we cheerfully adopt words from everywhere and make them our own. We always have. This habit enriches the language and gives us choice about how we say things. When we need a word, we create one. Mobile phones created the need for a word for the other sort of phone, so we got "land line", the same applies to a "desk top" computer. Have you heard a neat way of describing non-decaffeinated coffee? Caffeinated is the obvious, boring answer but there are lots of others in use.

Latin is dead - adopt from the Italians now

Take the word "panini" which means "bread rolls" in Italian, make the meaning narrower so it is now a particular type of roll complete with filling that you buy in a sandwich shop and ask them to heat up. Make it singular and add an "s" to prove that it is a fully integrated English word. Now we can have a panini or a couple of paninis, much to the bemusement of visiting Italians (and MS Word - it gets me a red wiggly line).

Choose your level of formality

We can use different words for formal or informal language without ever lapsing into the ungrammatical or impolite:

The enquiry telephone number is available in the event that further information is required.

Means the same as:

If you have any questions, please phone the helpline

Apart from "the", every word in these two sentences is different. They are both grammatically correct but they have a very different "feel" and we would use them for different readers and in different circumstances.

No, what upsets me is when useful distinctions get blurred because people no longer  understand them. There is a clear distinction between "disinterested" and "uninterested", but apparently it is only understood by a small proportion of the population. Little by little, literate people stop using them because their readers will misunderstand them. That saddens me because it makes the language poorer.

Howard Jacobson from the Independent makes this point persuasively in his article, "In the face of overwhelming ignorance, it is the pedant's duty to keep battling on."  He says:

Differentiation matters. Ignorance is not argument. Disinterestedness is not another word for "Whadever!". We are quick to outlaw words when they don't suit the temper of the times. We should, to defy the temper of the times, try rescuing a few.

Take positive action

Why don't you choose a word to rescue? Like endangered species, some are more fun than others. A Sumatran tiger word would be something like "discombobulate" (it does exist, look it up). A grey-backed beetle (I made that up) word would be something like "continual" which is different from "continuous". Pick one and start using it absolutely accurately whenever you can. Have fun and post your ideas here!

 

How to check your writing - efficiently! | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

How to check your writing - efficiently!

Do you hit the send button as soon as you have written an email - or do you sit and read it twenty times - or do you just stare at it for ages? For an efficient checking method, read on.

First, read through the eyes of your audience

When you have finished your first draft - of an email, a letter, a proposal or the result of six months' research - take a break. Of course the length of the break will need to be proportionate to the task, and may be only a minute or two - but it is no less important for that.

Now think about the person (or people) who are going to read what you have written. How much do you know about them? Imagine them reading it - are they going to be receptive to your message or resistent? What are they expecting, what do they need to know and what do they know already? What do they really care about and what makes them tick? How familiar are they with your industry jargon?

When you have got yourself thoroughly into their frame of mind, read your document through their eyes. Does it answer their question, does it come across with the right tone and is it likely to get the response you wanted? How is it going to make them feel, and is that the way it should be?

Make any changes you need to make now. Personally, being a rather direct speaker by nature, I almost always find that I add some niceties at the beginning of my emails as a result of this process. Instead of opening with "My training courses normally run over two days..." I insert "Thank you for your interest in my writing skills courses, and I enjoyed hearing about your company this morning..." That sort of thing.

I call this process reviewing.

Next, check the picky little details

Now for the really boring bit. Read through very slowly line by line and make sure that your writing is accurate and consistent.
1. Are there any spelling mistakes or typos (for example "from" when you meant "form" or the wrong kind of "principle" or "licence")
2. Have you written any sentences that are over 25 words long (about a line and half usually)or have you missed any of the little words like "of".
3. Are your bullets, headings and sub-headings formatted consistently? They are very visible and therefore disproportionately important.
4. Have you used any words that can be written different ways (capital letter or not on government; guide-lines or guidelines - there are hundreds of these)? If so, decide which one you want to adopt and do a find and replace on the alternatives.
5. Are names spelt right and have you carefully removed the names of the previous recipient of a document very like this one?
6. Have you used abbreviations consistently and explained them if the reader may be unfamililar with them.

This is the proofreading process

Use the Word processor when you can

The spelling and grammar checkers are by no means perfect but they are extremely useful. When you get a wiggly line, look carefully to see if you understand why. If not, just read extra carefully to make sure you are happy with what you have written. Never follow the grammar or spelling checker's suggestions without understanding them.

There are some little known resources hiding in Word's grammar checker including "readability statistics" which enables you to check your average sentence length. If you have trouble finding it, check this blog.

The find and replace function, already mentioned, is very handy but never select "replace all". Disasters of the most unthinkable kind lurk there - maybe you have an experience to share? An author I know changed his mind at the last minute about the name of his heroine, Lisa. Find and replace was the obvious solution - and 265 instances later, he sent the book to the publisher. Fortunately, the proof-reader was thorough and picked up a surprising reference to the famous smile of the Mona Carrie.

The separation matters, not the order

I have suggested here that you should review and then proofread. Actually, it doesn't matter which order you do these in as long as you don't try to do both jobs at the same time. Concentrating on one type of information at a time is critical or you will not be able to do either of them thoroughly.

Now STOP

If your document is a long one, say over five pages, it may be worth splitting the job into more subsections. For example, formatting might deserve separate attention - it depends on where the complexities are and what is important.
When you have thoroughly reviewed and proofread your document, send it. You can go on re-reading it of course - but the chances of spending your time productively are very low. You may stare at it for another hour and pick up one little error - don't. Your time is more valuable than that. Go and do something more useful.

 

Should you hyphenate “trademark”? | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

Should you hyphenate “trademark”?

Hyphenation is complicated and people do not always agree about it. If you follow these guidelines, you won't go far wrong.

Quite a few people have asked me about this. Should I hyphenate trademark? What about worldwide? Are there fixed rules about where to put hyphens and how do I know?

The general answers are these:

1. The rules are not fixed so you should use a dictionary or follow the spellchecker (or spell-checker?).
2. For any word that you use regularly in your work, decide what you are going to do and stick to it. Otherwise you will waste a lot of time checking and changing.

A word I often have to write is "proofread". My favourite dictionary (Collins Concise Dictionary) puts "proofread" first, meaning that it is the preferred option, but allows "proof-read" as an alternative. The same dictionary says "trademark" very firmly with no alternatives and "worldwide" but also "trade name".

Just to emphasise how difficult this subject is, the Economist Style Guide on-line devotes a large section to a list of individual words where hyphenation is not obvious. According to my book version of the Economist Style Guide, there should be hyphens in drawing-board, pre-war and think-tank but not in soyabean, underpaid or overrule.

Then there are words like re-mark and re-sign where the un-hyphenated word has a separate meaning altogether. Think about asking someone to re-sign a contract or resign it. The distinction could be significant I think.

Conclusion: it's complicated. Don't ask for logic or rules, just look it up somewhere reputable and then stick to the answer you get.

 

17 ways to use a dictionary | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

17 ways to use a dictionary

There are so many things you can do with a dictionary - thick book or online. And you can't enjoy writing without one.

1. Clear up confusions

Which is which of compliment and complement? Any dictionary will tell you, the one with the ‘e' means complete and the other one means making polite comments.

2. Fine distinctions

Is there are a difference between continuous and continual? What does nice actually mean?

3. Have fun

Fin wonderful words like curmudgeonly or discombobulate, create words and then check them in the dictionary to make sure they don't exist yet. Lewis Carroll invented ‘chortle' as a blend of chuckle and snort. Now it is a recognised dictionary word. Over to you! I like ‘swiggle' - what does it suggest to you?

4. History of words

Did you know that ‘nice' originally meant precise? A nice fit would have been a suit cut to perfection. Now its meaning is so imprecise that it is hard to describe: pleasant, enjoyable, friendly...

5. Hyphenate or not?

You will find alternatives for lots of words, for example: help-desk or helpdesk. Some words you might expect to be hyphenated never are, such as trademark. There's no way of knowing, just look it up.

6. Keep door open

If your door shuts by itself and you don't want it to, put a dictionary on the floor. Effective until you need to look a word up... maybe you should invest in one of those little rubber wedge things.

7. Learn new words

Sign up for the word of the day on dictionary.com

8. Online

If you look for an online dictionary on Google, make sure it is a UK one. Anything with the word ‘Webster' anywhere near it will definitely be US. You will probably be sucked one way or another into one of these two: dictionary.reference.com which is associated with ask.com and plastered with ads and links to other ask sites 2. dictionary.alot.com which you have to sign up for. The best freely accessible and definitely UK one I have found is www.askoxford.comreference books which appears to have nothing to do with ask.com. The definitions are clear and there are ‘usage notes' which point out common confusions and similar words. Important note: when you search for a word, remember to select ‘dictionary' rather than the default which is ‘entire askoxford site'.

9. Press flowers

The ‘Shorter Oxford Dictionary' is best for this. 1. It is enormous and 2. There are much better dictionaries for looking stuff up in.

9. Raise height of projector

Only if it needs a big hoist. A stack of magazines is easier to fine-tune.

10. Rescue a word

This is so much fun. What words do you miss? What do you not hear enough any more? Leaf through a dictionary for ideas.

11. Show off

Did you know that discrete means separate, distinct as in discrete steps rather than a continuous slide? Use it tomorrow and amaze your friends.

12. Spare key concealment

This is a terrible thing to do to a book - so only consider it if you have an inferior dictionary inherited from your grandmother. Cut a hole in a several consecutive pages and hide the key. Then a burglar won't find it - but will you?

13. Spelling

Are you sure how to spell dependent, or is it dependant? Or are there two different words? And is 'supersede' really spelt like that?

14. Throw at cat

If the cat starts scratching the carpet while you are on the phone to an esteemed customer.  You will always, of course, have your dictionary close to hand after all.  Throw to miss if you value your cat.

15. Understand stuff

When you read the Economist, or stretch your mind by embarking on a serious biography, you will encounter words you don't know. Look them up! Remember them! I recently found ‘reticulate' - meaning 'in the form of a network'. Why that is not commonly used, I wonder. After all ‘network' is much overused is it not?

16. US/UK differences

Is it true that ‘capitalize' is the US version of ‘capitalise'? I think you may be surprised that most UK dictionaries accept either. In other words, the ...ise/...ize thing is all a matter of preference. For rulings on individual words, the Economist style guide is useful.

17. Win arguments

Is there such a word as ‘unprecise' or do you have to say ‘imprecise'? Why? We all know what ‘unprecise' means don't we?

Overseas students are better at English than the British | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

Overseas students are better at English than the British

There is now quantitative research to prove the point that students learning English as a second language do it more thoroughly than those who start off with the huge advantage of speaking it at home.

This has been my observation for a number of years in the commercial world I inhabit. I frequently find that the rules of grammar have been very well absorbed by the attendees on my training courses whose second language is English. The attendees who were educated in Britain, on the other hand, often have little idea what I mean by passives, subject and verb matching or when to use ‘I' or ‘me'.

I was therefore very interested to read in yesterday's Independent that Professor Bernard Lamb of Imperial College has done some quantitative research on this subject and has proved the point. He counted the grammatical and spelling errors made by his final year students (his subject is genetics) and compared the performance of British against international students. The result was an average 52.2 per paper for the Brits and 18.8 for the overseas students.

How characteristically Professor Lamb and I reacted to our observations! He measured scientifically to test his hypothesis, and has concluded that the education system does not take grammar and good English seriously enough. I acted on my hunch and developed a website that helps people to learn grammar on the go, test themselves on their grammar and improve their knowledge in short on-line sessions.  Here you are Professor Lamb, send your students this way.

 

Blank Page Strategies | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

Blank Page Strategies

Most people suffer from white page syndrome or similar when faced with a writing task. Here is a coping strategy I find very valuable.

People call it writer's block, procrastination, blank page syndrome... Whatever it feels like, we all have trouble starting writing jobs; even professional writers need strategies.

Here's a technique I often turn to in my hour of need. Take a sheet of paper and a pencil. Write these words with plenty of space between them:

Know

Feel

Do

Under ‘know' list the factual information that you need your reader to understand as a result of reading what you are about to write.
For me now, this is:

  • Everyone experiences some form of writers' block.
  • There are lots of strategies - this is one
  • How to use ‘know, feel, do'.

Under ‘feel' write down how you would like your readers to feel when they read it.
In my case:

  • Reassured that it is not just them
  • Interested to try a new technique
  • That this looks useful and maybe Jane Penson has other interesting things to say

Under ‘do', write down what you would like your readers to do directly as a result of reading this. For me:

  • Give it a try next time they write something
  • Look at other blogs I have written
  • Have a nose around the rest of the website

Benefits

  • It only takes a few minutes.
  • It can get your thinking process started before you even see the big white screen staring out at you.
  • You get your head in the right place (thinking about the readers).
  • You will focus on facts first which is often a good strategy.

Try it today. Let me know how you get on.

 

Sycophant | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

Sycophant

Nice word but with an even more fascinating origin

You may know that 'sycophant' means someone who flatters another person, possibly insincerely and probably to gain favour with them.  But did you know the fasinating origin of this word?  It comes from the Greek and its literal meaning is 'fig shower' - that's 'shower' to rhyme with 'mower' not 'hour'.

Apparently, there was a vulgar gesture used by the ancient Greeks that they referred to as the fig.  I will leave you to imagine it.  If you showed someone the fig it indicated that you thought they were an informer, providing information to the authorities about people who were stealing fruit. 

It may be me getting confused, but if the sycophant was the fig shower, surely the meaning has reversed over the years?

 

 

1. A Friend in Need | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

1. A Friend in Need

An old friend walked back into my life with a desperate need (in my opinion of course) for Grammar to Go. I shall be fascinated to find out if he agrees.

I ran into an old friend the other day. I'd heard Philip had recently started his own business, so when he suggested a quick cup of coffee, I accepted. After all, we had plenty to catch up on. Two milky lattes later, we had caught up on pretty much all of the big events of the last five years. I had also learned that running his own business was not quite the pioneering dream that my friend had hoped it would be. Unreliable suppliers, an unstable economy and the constant pressure to sell - not to mention the Accountancy Labyrinth - had deprived this man of much-needed sleep.

"But the worst thing", Philip told me, "Is how duplication of effort is robbing my time."

I asked him what he meant, and he went on to explain.

"My sales and procurement teams are all responsible for producing their own documents. These could range from presentations and price sheets, to letters and emails - all of which are read by our suppliers, our customers and our competition. I didn't realise how badly written they were at first: after all, my staff are all bright, well-educated people, so I'd trusted that they could write perfectly well. How wrong I was! Now I insist that all documents come to me for checking before they are released. I'm spending most of my day checking and correcting their work - rather than focusing on running my business!"

After expressing my sympathy - and he really did look exhausted and fed-up! - I told Phil about Grammar to Go, and explained how this inexpensive, easy-to-use online grammar reference could save his company time and money. Grammar to Go's functionality - from the spelling and grammar coaching through to the commonly-used phrases and the personal helpline - would empower his staff to write their own documents, swiftly and accurately - giving Phil back the time he needs to manage his business.

Phil was interested, but needed convincing. So I suggested he sign up for just one month: a single payment of £15 to see if the tool made any real difference.

"Go on then - I'll give it a whirl. After all, I've paid nearly half that for these lattes!"

I wonder how he's getting on... I'll give him a ring in a week or two, and let you know.

Pig Perfect Proofreaders 1 | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

Pig Perfect Proofreaders 1

How much of a perfectionist are you? Can you sniff out grammatical and spelling errors the way pigs find truffles? For our first instalment of Pig Perfect Proofreaders I thought we'd take a suitably autumnal theme.

See how many errors you can spot - and email me your answers by Friday 13 November. The best response will win a mention on this blog and a link for the website of your choice. I would also love to hear about your favourite techniques for accurate proofreading. It's not easy and you may have some interesting methods I could distribute to other readers of these pages. Read carefully, and good luck:

Winter Whether

"It was a dark, stormy night. The howling wind's whipped around the cottage, making every beam creek and shiver. Curled up inside, though, my father and I were as snug as mice. We'd arrived at the cottage that afternoon, and would be staying just for two nights' before continueing our journey to Scotland.
"Fancy some cocoa, Dad? The kettles just boiled."
"Great - I don't suppose theres any chance of some toast, too?"
I rustled around the little kitchen, whipping up hot butered toast and cocoa in no time at all. I brought our supper in on a tray Id found, and placed it on the table.
"Here we go, Dad - come and get it."
I was greated with silence, however. The sofa was empty - and of my father, there was no sign.
"Dad? Are you upstair's?"
Silence. I peered out of the window - perhaps he'd popped outside for more firewood? But no - not a wisper from my father.
"Im sure he'll be back in a minute", I said to myself. I'll just pour a cup of cocoa - and wait."

Spooky - I wonder where her father went. Come back next week to find out more... and to find out who the eagle-eyed perfectionist is that won this week's prize!

 

A Proofreader on a Director’s Salary | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

A Proofreader on a Director’s Salary

It does feel good when a customer genuinely says "I love that! It saves me several hours a week."

This was the comment of a director in one of the big consultancies with whom I have been working for some years on raising report writing standards .  He has just started to see the enormous benefits to his team of ready access to answers to all their grammar questions.  It has taken some time for writers to realise how useful Grammar to Go is, and to start using it, but the results are beginning to show.  The line managers don't have time to sit and explain grammatical points, and are not always sure of the answer themselves - but they can say: "look it up in Grammar to Go - and if you can't find it email them your question".

There is now more consensus about what is right, and more people are looking words up rather than guessing.  The grammar checker is only useful if you know how to use it - and now more people are able to use it intelligently.

My client reckons that he personally is spending at least an hour a week less on correcting English - which means he can put the effort into reviewing content, which is what he should be doing. Some of the managers reporting to him are seeing benefits filter through as well.  Also, by the way, they are more confident about the quality of reports that are going out to customers.  How do you value beauty sleep?

 

2. A Friend with a Grin | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

2. A Friend with a Grin

Suddenly I seem to be a VIP in my friend Phil's eyes. Very gratifying.

Business buzzing

Phil's offices are located in a pleasant business park near Bracknell. As soon as I walked through the door, I could feel that heady ‘business buzz' that I remember from my own corporate days. Men and women were striding purposefully into meeting rooms, talking earnestly into mobile phones, or greeting visitors in the busy reception area.
"Rest assured it's not always like this!" Phil greeted me with a handshake and a smile. "We're entertaining our shareholders and our biggest clients today: a series of presentations right through the day, culminating in a big speech and then a drinks reception at 5pm."
"Aha - that explains all the busy-looking people! So who's giving the big speech, Phil?"
Phil coughed nervously. "Er - I am! As CEO, I need to provide a summary of the year just gone - and a perspective on what I think lies ahead for us in the year to come."
"Sounds impressive, Phil - are you feeling confident?"

Perfect Presentations

Phil smiled. "I am now. That's why I invited you, Jane. I wanted you to see the difference that Grammar to Go has made to my presentation - both the content and the style. If you're free until 5pm, I'd love it if you could sit in on my final speech. See what you think - then I'll show you what I was going to present before I signed up to Grammar to Go. I think you'll notice quite a difference!"
"Great, how exciting - I'd love to stay and listen. But it's only 11am now, Phil - won't I be getting in the way in the intervening hours?"
"Not at all." Phil indicated we should move towards the lifts. "Like I said, there are presentations running all morning and all afternoon. I wanted you to listen to a couple of others - and give me your honest opinion."
The first session of the day was being held in a spacious boardroom on the second floor.
"That's our Sales Manager for the East of England." Phil indicated a tall, nervous-looking man stepping up to the microphone.

... or not?

As soon as the man began speaking, I could tell he didn't feel comfortable. The Sales Manager had prepared around ten slides to accompany his speech - but they didn't do him any favours. Even without knowing much about the subject matter, I spotted numerous grammatical and spelling errors that, sadly, detracted from his presentation. I could see that some of the other people had noticed them, too.
When the Sales Manager had finished, he was replaced by a younger man who began to speak confidently about his team's progress that year.
"That's one of our team leads", whispered Phil. "Can you see the difference?"
I certainly could. In contrast to his managers' presentation, this man spoke confidently and precisely, and the slides that accompanied his speech were neat, succinct and word-perfect.
After the applause died down, Phil turned to me, smiling. "Example number one: guess who's been using Grammar to Go in our Norwich office!"
"That's not hard!" I laughed. "And no prizes for guessing who thought they didn't need it! I don't think the Manager will take much convincing, though, do you?"

The Rules of Separation | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

The Rules of Separation

How to make sure your words all hang together as they should - because separation can have unfortunate consequences.

Sometimes it's a good idea to play about with the construction of a sentence. Altering the position of a subject and a descriptor can bring a piece of writing to life - but in doing so, it's important to take care that the meaning is not mangled.
One nice little technique is to begin a sentence with an ‘introductory phrase' which relates to the second part of the sentence. For example:

1. As a keen mathematician, this style of research was both enjoyable and rewarding.
2. Used correctly, presentations and speeches can really benefit from Grammar to Go.

A familiar style, right? But both of the sentences above are actually wrong. This is because the subject of the main part of the sentence is different from the one that the introductory phrase describes.
In Example 1, who is the keen mathematician? If it is ‘I' (I am a keen mathematician), the main part of the sentence needs to start with that - like this:

1. As a keen mathematician, I found this style of research both enjoyable and rewarding.

Similarly, in Example 2 the introductory phrase describes Grammar to Go. So that should be what comes immediately after the comma, like this:

2. Used correctly, Grammar to Go can be of real benefit when writing presentations and speeches.

Remember - an introductory phrase introduces the words straight after it!
Over to you - is this right?

3. While reading through his speech for the last time, the fish in the professor's briefcase began to smell.

Does this help or hinder? Are you more or less confused? Let us know - we really want to help. If you're not sure of the answer to no. 3 - send in your answer and we'll let you know.

Pig Perfect Proofreaders 2 | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

Pig Perfect Proofreaders 2

How much of a perfectionist are you? This is the second instalment of our challenge, the first of which was won by Maggie Berney who is obviously a very capable virtual PA. Welcome to the second instalment - and part two of our spooky story. The prize is a boost for your website and the deadline is Friday 20th November. Good luck

Last week's Dynamic Detective was Maggie Berney of Maggie Berney Office Services, based in Reading. Maggie correctly identified 12 mistakes - which wins her exposure here on the Grammar to Go website and on twitter. Will it be your turn this week? As before, this week's instalment contains a number of spelling and grammatical errors. If you are the first person to email me with the correct answers, we will bang the drum about your business all over the twittersphere - now there's an incentive for you! The deadline is Friday 20th November.

Something shadowy in the doorway

I pored myself a cup of cocoa, and settled back in the armchair by the fire, waiting for a sound that heralded my fathers' return - from wherever he had disappeared to. It wasn't long before the flickering fire, the sweet coco and the mowning wind began to have a lulling effect on me. I must have drifted off - because suddenly I started, eyes wide open, and very, very aware that something was wrong.

The fire had died, and now only a few embers glinted in the dark room. The wind had stopped it's sinister howling - silence greeted me. My sudden awakening had coursed me to slosh the dregs of my cocoa down my jean's. As I rose, however, my eye caught sight of something by the door-way to the kitchen. I froze like a statue. Because what I saw seemed impossible... incredible... inhuman.

My mind raced through the ancient books and manuscripts that my father and I had poured over these last few months - and now - unbelievably - I was facing the sauce of are fascination. A low growling began to fill the room... and the hair's on my neck prickled. I wanted to move - but I new that if I so much as breathd, the consequences could be abominable...

 

Goodness - what is the thing she has spotted by the doorway? It sound terrifying - even scarier than the hideous mistakes that litter that passage!
Do your detective work and email me your answers by Friday 20th November. The best answer wins web exposure.
See you next week for Part Three!

 

3. A Perfect Presentation | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

3. A Perfect Presentation

Fascinating to see the excellent use these presenters have made of Grammar to Go.

I hadn't intended spending the whole day at Phil's offices, but the more I saw, the more I wanted to know. We had started our morning by listening to a sales update, from the East of England Sales Director and one of his team leaders. Both Phil and I had been struck by the difference in quality and confidence of the two men. The fact that the team leader had been using Grammar to Go, while his director had not, had been painfully obvious. The former gentleman's presentation was littered with spelling mistakes and grammatical errors, which spoiled his presentation, and made him appear less confident and professional. The team leader, on the other hand, had presented a faultless update, enhanced by a clear and accurate set of slides. And I'm sure you can guess who received the most applause!

The Guide by Your Side

At lunchtime, Phil had introduced me to the team leader.
"Congratulations", I said, shaking the young man by the hand. "Fantastic presentation. You must be very pleased with yourself."
"I'm relieved, actually", he replied, laughing. "I didn't have long to prepare, you see - in fact, I was only told I would be presenting two days ago!"
"Heavens! So you pulled together that speech and those slides in just 48 hours?"
"Less", he winked. "About four hours, to tell the truth. But I did have a bit of help."
"Aha - a willing colleague?"
"No - a new tool we're using in Norwich. Grammar to Go - don't know if you've heard of it? It really helped me make sense of the words and phrases I wanted to use. Of course, I had to structure the overall presentation myself, but I used the online tool to check over my grammar and spelling. Couldn't have done it without!"
My conversation with the team lead had left me feeling pretty pleased with myself, so I was very optimistic when, at 4pm, Phil ushered me in to the main boardroom for his own presentation.
"I'm using slides, too", Phil explained. "Unlike the chap you met at lunchtime, though, I've been working on mine for about four weeks. I was drawing blanks, though - until last week. Take a look at this." Phil handed me a sheaf of paper. "That was my presentation before I played around with Grammar to Go. Have a flip through that while I'm up there."
Twenty minutes and one very successful presentation later, I was shaking Phil's hand and congratulating him on a faultless speech and set of slides.
"See a difference?" he asked, winking. "Now - follow me. There's someone I'd like you to meet. Geoff over here works in our marketing department. I think the two of you could have a very interesting conversation..."

If only the grammar checker would stick to checking grammar | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

If only the grammar checker would stick to checking grammar

Computers have a lot to learn about grammar and they will never be able to make stylistic choices, so wouldn't it be better if they didn't try?

If I employed a gardener, I would want him to mow the lawn, sweep up the leaves and do the boring, mechanical tasks haven't got the time or the patience to do. He will never know exactly how I want my visitors to feel when they walk through the gate so I wouldn't want him to recommend a nice climbing rose for my front door. Well, it's the same with grammar checkers. They don't know my relationship with my reader and whether the passive would be preferable here or if I am perfectly happy with a sentence that begins with ‘but'. Where the grammar checker really scores is for inadvertently missed or repeated words, forgotten capital letters and subjects that don't match the number of the verb. I can do this stuff, and I can mow my lawn, but it's very pleasant to have the bulk of it done for me.

Philip Hensher, in his article in the Independent "Computers have a lot to learn about grammar" misses this point I feel. He complains that computers are programmed using rules based on school-taught principles such as not repeating words and not using the passive or fragments. If only these were taught in school! But that is another subject. These are stylistic preferences, not grammar. He makes a nice case for repeated words in literature and points out that the only authors who use "muttered" and "breathed" in order to avoid repeating "said" are bad ones. He is quite right that there is no sin in using the passive - it is perfectly correct, just rather off-putting when used incessantly where a more direct and approachable tone would have been preferable.

It is axiomatic that a grammar checker cannot make stylistic choices, and in my view it would be better for everyone if it didn't try. Authors, poets and journalists who enjoy writing and write for people who enjoy reading can and should over-rule their grammar checkers anyway but spare a thought for business writers.

Many of the people who use grammar checkers every day derive no pleasure from writing and don't expect their readers to either. Their objective is to get business information over to an equally harassed audience efficiently and spend as little time writing as possible. There is little room in this process for considering the fine distinction between "a long, long way" and "a long way". I know from experience that these business writers normally ignore "passive, consider revising" because it is such a hopelessly unhelpful comment. If you know your grammar isn't up to much, you are not in a position to distinguish between style preferences and grammatical correctness, so wouldn't it be better if the computer kept it simple and just swept up the leaves?

 

4. The Results begin to Show | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

4. The Results begin to Show

In this instalment, the "grammar lady" is named and encounters an extremely grateful marketing professional who has used Grammar to Go as part of an education process for his team.

Phil had just introduced me to Geoff, one of the senior members of his marketing team.
“Ah, so you’re the grammar lady!”, Geoff shook me warmly by the hand. “We’ve got a lot to thank you for. “
“Glad to hear you’re finding it useful. What’s been the biggest benefit for you, then?”
“Speed” Geoff replied, without hesitation. “Our team used to complain that everything was done ‘on the fly’. Our merchandisers would sometimes ring us up at 9am, and ask us to produce some new signage or a new flyer by noon. That meant coming up with the creative, checking the pricing or the special offer with our commercial guys, writing the actual words – then getting it off to the printers at the double. There was no time for checking or double-checking – more’s the pity!”
“Let me guess – errors were not uncommon, right?”


“Right!” laughed Geoff. “I can joke about it now, but the number of people I’ve bawled out for producing a really shoddy piece of writing. Take a look at this...”
Geoff handed me a large lever-arch folder. Opening it revealed a catalogue of their marketing over the last twelve months. Starting in January, I could see what Geoff meant about errors: a good 70% of the materials in the file contained mis-placed apostrophes, incorrect use of capital letters, or wrongly-spelt words. One particular example – a billboard that had apparently sat outside one of their stores for a fortnight – contained no less than four glaring mistakes.
“I really took our team to task over this one. Can you imagine how humiliating it was for me, trying to explain how this happened? Not to mention the number of customer complaints we had...”


“I can imagine. People just love finding fault with things, don’t they?”, I nodded in sympathy.
“After my lecture, the team took their writing much more seriously. But it meant they took longer to produce our marketing materials. Which, as you can imagine, didn’t go down well with our merchandisers.”

Pig Perfect Proofreaders 3 | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

Pig Perfect Proofreaders 3

How much of a perfectionist are you? Another virtual PA won the second instalment - come on the copywriters, pedants and trainers out there, are you going to let virtual PAs show you up! You can do this too.

Welcome to the third instalment of Pig Perfect Proofreaders – and part three of our spooky story. Last week’s dynamic detective was Anne Gerrish of Penguin Office Supplies, based in Norfolk. Anne correctly identified 20 mistakes – which wins her a week of promotional activity through the Grammar to Go website and on twitter.
Will it be your turn this week? As always, this week's instalment contains a number of spelling and grammatical errors. Identify where they are and how they should read and get your answer to me by Friday December 11.

The Mistery Hound

The creature remained perfectly still, crouch’d low in the doorway and silouetted in the moonlight that filtered through the window. With-out a shadow of doubt, I knew that this was the beast that my father and I had been searching four. And to come face to face with it now – with my farther missing – was even more incredible.
My mind raced back to the manuscript’s that we had spent the last three years poring over, frantically scrabbling for a fragment of infomation that might give me clue as to how to master the creature. Then I remembered the words that had been whispered to us by an ancient librarian. His hands has trembled violentyly as he pointed to a series of pictures and diagrams.

“The Hound fears nothing,” the old man had whispered. “Nothing, that is, except it’s own reflection. Then, and only then, can the beast be conqered.”
I glanced over to the table under the window. The pewter tray containing my now-cold coco mug was still there, shining brightly in the moonlight.
“Thats’ it”, I realised. “If I can only reach that tray – and shine it in the hound’s face...”

Reaching it – before the hound reached me – was a different matter, of course. The creature inched closer, teeth bared, it’s growling louder now.
I did’nt have long. My root to the table was blocked by the sofa, however. I could never scramble over that before the hound reached me. I was trapped. Where, dear Lord, WHERE was my father?

Good grief... talk about a cliff-hanger! I hope you will be able to come back to find out what happens next!
Off you go then, grammar detectives: spot those evil errors for me, and email me your answers by 11 December.
The final instalment is the last one before Christmas!

Hearing is Believing | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

Hearing is Believing

Frank Hobson of Frank Hobson Consulting offers some very valuable advice for writers who think faster than they type, find it hard to pick up little mistakes in their own writing, or generally find proofreading a big bore. I think that is most of us!


Frank says:
One of my best proofreading aids is text-to-speech software. I use it at the final stage of producing longer, or particularly important, documents. When proofreading your own documents (which all but the most important of us have to do nowadays) it is so easy to miss small but crucial mistakes or logical errors that had been there since your first draft. Hearing your work read back to you really helps spot that, instead of an evaluation (assess), you have actually offered a herd of donkeys (asses) or to realise that a misplaced ‘not’ has changed the whole meaning.

The program that I use is Wordread provided by Serif. It has a really nice tone of voice and a very natural way of reading the text. My version was very cheap but they no longer sell that version (which, anyway does not work beyond Windows XP. They currently sell Wordread3, which is £50. Not sure whether they offer one of their money-back-if-not-happy deals on that but there are other programs available many of which will allow a trial period download.

A related tip is that I have recently started using speech-to-text software. These programs have improved tremendously in recent years and I have been really impressed with how quickly I was able to get started and how accurately it picks up what I say. Read a little more on Frank's blog

5. Writing Accuracy is Becoming a Habit | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

5. Writing Accuracy is Becoming a Habit

The team have really got into the habit of using Grammar to Go to improve their own accuracy, eye for detail and interest in getting the written word just right.

It was nearly a fortnight after my day at Phil’s offices before I heard from him again. I had been extremely busy with enquiries about Grammar to Go, and had only just finished explaining the service to another interested company, when my phone rang again. It was good to hear Phil’s voice – and particularly good to hear him sounding very upbeat.
“Actually, I have an invitation for you. “
“Oh yes?”
“We’re exhibiting at ExCEL later this week. Fancy coming along? Tickets are free if you register as a guest on our website...”
I logged on later that day – and was surprised to see that Phil’s company site had undergone some pretty significant changes since I had last visited it. The text on the homepage was much punchier – fewer words, with very clear messages. And whereas the right-hand column had previously housed a lengthy product descriptions, this had now been replaced by three bold product offers: short, crisp titles and a single line of descriptive text underneath. I was impressed – it looked very slick; a great improvement on the previous version. I made up my mind to mention this to Phil when we caught up at the exhibition.
On the day of the exhibition itself, I arrived at ExCEL early enough to register, grab a quick coffee and stroll around the other stands before the halls started filling up. Wandering through the aisles, I picked up a few leaflets and brochures from some of the exhibitors. They were fairly standard – nothing that made any one stand out more than the others.
Finally, I found Phil’s stand. They’d managed to secure a very good spot – not far from a coffee vendor, and with three open sides. The backdrop consisted of two large, mounted printouts explaining the services that Phil’s company provided. Perspex carousels were positioned at either end of the stand, each crammed with brochures and flyers.
“Great stand, Phil! Looks like your team put a good deal of work into this!”
Phil laughed, shaking his head.
“Would you believe it – just three days! It was all very last minute... we only secured our spot last Tuesday afternoon, and our printer needed all the materials from us by Friday in order to get these huge printouts to us for the start of the exhibition. So our graphics team literally had three days to turn it all around!”
“Needless to say, it’s absolutely word-perfect...no prizes for guessing why!”
“Absolutely – actually, there’s a funny story there. Before going to print, we received a proof from our printer – and they’d accidentally mis-typed three words from our originals. Our graphics guys picked the mistakes up immediately. That would never have happened before we started using Grammar to Go. The best bit is that they remember the rules and advice – the way Grammar to Go is presented is easy for everyone to understand.”
I nodded, happy to see that my service was having such a widespread effect in Phil’s office.
“I’m so pleased, Phil. Mind you, it looks like someone over there could use a bit of help...”
Phil and I turned to watch an unfortunate scene at a nearby stand, where a red-faced young man was unhappily removing all of the flyers from their display units.
“I wonder what the problem is? I hate being nosy, but he look s pretty upset... perhaps I’ll go and ask if he needs any help...”

6. Grammar to Go to the Rescue Again! | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

6. Grammar to Go to the Rescue Again!

There is nothing like a crisis to get someone listening when you have a solution to their problem.

As a general rule, I don’t like to interfere in other people’s troubles: I’d far rather be asked for help than solicit it! But the young man on the next stand to us at ExCEL looked so upset that I felt he could really use some moral support.
“Tell me if you’d rather I kept away, but is everything alright? I couldn’t help but notice that you and your manager seemed a little agitated back there...”
The young man sighed and shook his head.
“Thanks for asking – and no, I don’t mind telling you. It’s my fault, really. I was in charge of developing the materials for the conference, and unfortunately there seem to be quite a few errors in the wording. Nothing contentious, you understand – just general spelling and grammar. But it does look unprofessional. So naturally, our Director is pretty upset, and he’s asked me to remove them all...”
The man sighed again. “It was a time thing – that’s all. I simply didn’t have the time to go through the text with a fine-toothed comb. What an idiot. Trouble is, this isn’t the first time it’s happened... and I think I could have used up my last chance.”
I smiled at him wryly. “Time and attention to detail don’t often go hand in hand, it’s true. On a positive note, I might have a solution for you – but you’ll have to convince your manager. Have you got five minutes?”
As I helped the chap – whose name was Charlie – to pack up the offending booklets, I explained all about Grammar to Go. Unsurprisingly, he seemed very interested – but was unsure how to pitch the idea to his manager.
“It’s not a hard idea to sell, Charlie. Don’t think of the technicalities – talk to him about time and money. Grammar to Go will save you time by providing a quick, easy resource to check all of your written materials. No more ploughing through the dictionary or thesaurus; and no more Googling certain phrases. What other profitable business activities could you be doing with that saved time – activities that you currently don’t have the capacity to do? Secondly, Grammar to Go saves your company money. These booklets are a case in point. Getting them printed and dispatched has cost you money – and in the eyes of your Director, they’re useless. But if they were word-perfect first time, they would have a long shelf-life – and would probably be a more compelling read, and therefore attract more business. Lastly, your new language capability will mean that you don’t have to rely on a ‘creative agency’ to write your copy for you. I could go on, Charlie, but there you have three compelling reasons to try Grammar to Go. For £15 a month, it’s a no-brainer!”
“Jane, I think you’ve just articulated my business case! And you’re right, it is a no-brainer. I’ll pull something together this week – you don’t mind if I pass your details on to our Director, do you?”
I smiled happily.
“Charlie, I’d be delighted...”

7. A Teacher Explains the Difficulties of Writing it Right | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

7. A Teacher Explains the Difficulties of Writing it Right

It's quite embarrassing for teachers to have to admit that they are not totally sure of their grammar - and they certainly have plenty to write.

Isn’t Business interesting? You can channel huge amounts of effort into networking, building contacts, ‘selling’... but often, the most interesting lead comes when you least expect it. Like at a family get-together – when all you’re thinking about is why Auntie Eileen appears to have placed her reading glasses in her bowl of trifle (for the second time today!)
I had made some terrific contacts over the last few weeks – Phil, his colleagues, some of his clients – and even Charlie, the young man I’d helped out at the exhibition last week. So I was relieved to be enjoying a business-free day at a 50th Anniversary Party: a good mix of family, friends and plus-ones.
I’d been catching up with my cousin when she spotted a face across the room.
“Ah – there’s someone I’d love you to meet. Paul is my daughter’s fiancé – he’s just qualified as a teacher at the local sixth-form college. Come over and meet him.”
We wove our way across the room, and I found myself shaking hands with a pleasant young man who looked every inch the new teacher.
“Pleased to meet you, Jane. Tell me, what is it that you do?”
I roughly outlined my background , but I didn’t go into much detail – after all, this was a family gathering, and I wasn’t going to talk ‘business’ to a family member, however distantly-related he may be!
“Grammar, golly... now there’s a skill my colleagues could definitely use!”
“What do you mean, Paul?”
“Just that you wouldn’t believe the standard of English among the college staff. It’s quite embarrassing at times. Most of us are quite young, so we haven’t exactly had English Language drummed into us. Children of the digital age, and all that! Writing workbooks or exams, marking essays... even writing OFSTED reports... simply writing the content is pretty time-consuming, but ensuring that they’re spelled and punctuated correctly is another matter entirely. Most of the staff don’t bother – and we’ve been pulled up about it quite a few times by the head, as well as by the school inspectors. It just adds to our workload!”
It was a familiar story: another instance of someone compromising their free time in the name of good grammar. A real shame – when the solution is so simple!
“What if there was a simple way of checking your writing for accuracy? Asking questions, looking up confusing words or phrases... online, perhaps?”
“If only!” sighed Paul. There’s Dictionary.com, there’s Thesaurus.com, and I’m sure there are plenty of random websites packed with grammatical hints and tips. It takes time to find them all, though!”
“What if all of that information could be consolidated into one single place?”
“Now that would be worthwhile. It’d save us so much time – and embarrassment! Why, do you know of something?”
I smiled happily. “You know, I think I do. Where did you say your college was?”

There, there! | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

There, there!

If you ever scratch your head about "they're", "there" and "their", have a look at this and see if it helps. If not, tell us and we will try again!

One of the commonest mistakes in the English language is confusing words that sound the same, but that have very different meanings. Luckily this doesn’t often cause a real problem – after all, when we read something, we normally ‘vocalise’ the text in our own brains – so even if the spelling is wrong, we still get the meaning. But it does slow the reading process down.
‘There’ is probably the one word that causes more confusion than any other. Just think about the different uses:
• Put it over there
• They loved their holiday
• They’re leaving soon

Here are some suggestions about remembering which spelling to use – and why.
1. There is a place or an instance: over there; there is.
How to remember this one: take the ‘t’ off ‘there’ and you get ‘here’. But it’s not here, so it must be there.
2. Their belongs to someone: their holiday; their photos
I have not thought of a good way to remember this one – so if you have an idea that works for you, please let me know.
3. They’re is an abbreviation of ‘they are’: 'they are leaving' becomes 'they’re leaving', and 'they are correct' becomes 'they’re correct'.
How to remember this one: turn the ‘a’ from ‘are’ into an apostrophe – and there you have it!

If we add an ‘s’ on to the end, we get even more options!

• There’s a hole in my bucket
• It’s not mine, it’s theirs

1. There’s is an abbreviation of ‘there is’: there is a hole in my bucket becomes ‘there’s a hole in my bucket’
How to remember this one: turn the ‘i’ from ‘is’ into an apostrophe
2. Theirs still belongs to them. But whereas ‘their’ describes the thing that belongs to someone else, “theirs” replaces it.
When you say “No 6 is their house”, you need to mention the house. If someone said “No 6 is their...” You would ask, “their what?”
If someone says “No 6 is theirs” the word “theirs” means “their house”. In this sense, it is like “hers”, “ours” or “yours”.

Call back next week for another tip – or email me if there’s any issue you would like me to cover!

Give your Child a Love of Words for Christmas | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

Give your Child a Love of Words for Christmas

There is no greater gift than a love of reading. Spend time with your children this Christmas and encourage them to play games with words - let them find out for themselves how English works. It can be just as much fun as an electronic game if you play it with them.

Play word games with your children while you have time off work. Here are some ideas for different ages and reading abilities – but inventing your own is even better. The important thing is that you spend time, have fun and share an appreciation of our mad, quirky language with youngsters and encourage them to read more (and play computer games less maybe?)

Labels
Label items around the house such as chairs, tables and windows with a tiny spot of blu-tack or a “yellow sticky”
ï‚§ Mix the labels up and ask the child to sort them out
ï‚§ Leave letters out (ch**r) and get them to supply the right ones
ï‚§ Make up anagrams (ocadubpr and aletb)

Coded messages
Write a message to the child – telling them something that’s going to happen, a joke, or a silly comment
ï‚§ Replace each the vowel with a different number (d21r S1m)
ï‚§ Leave out all the vowels
ï‚§ Represent every letter with a number or symbol
ï‚§ Shift the alphabet along so you use a code like this: a=c; b=d; c=e etc)

Depending how difficult the child finds your code, you may want to supply hints, such as:
ï‚§ The commonest letter in English is “e”
ï‚§ All words have at least one vowel - normally a, e, i, o, u and occasionally only y (words like sly and fly).
ï‚§ A limited number of letters can be doubled (for example not a, i or w)

Slow reveal
Type words in quite big letters and cover them with a sheet of paper. Reveal them gradually from top to bottom and see how quickly your child can recognise them. Which is easier of capitals and lower case letters? Which are the hardest letters to distinguish? Get the child to challenge you (this game does make spelling quite important!)

Sounds the same
Think of groups of words that sound the same, such as:
ï‚§ Their, there, there
ï‚§ Pause, paws, pores
ï‚§ Pear, pair
ï‚§ Hear, here
If you run out of ideas, try this handy list. Write sentences or stories with the wrong ones in, for example: The dog has just come in with cold, wet pause. See if your child can spot them. If the game catches on, accept a return challenge.

Have fun.
 

Adjectives - Sprinkle Sparingly and Thoughtfully | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

Adjectives - Sprinkle Sparingly and Thoughtfully

Too many adjectives can destroy a good story - but well chosen ones bring it to life. Here is an invitation to think about a small number of adjectives

I find it annoying to read stories that are so weighed down with adjectives that the action slows to the pace of a limping slug. For example:
She raised the gleaming glass of clear, fresh, cool water to her parched lips and heaved a grateful sigh”.
Not only are there a lot of adjectives there, but most of them add too little to the image that would have been in our minds without them. I am no novelist, and I don’t pretend to be a great creative writer but I do love words and notice how people use them.

I have been thinking about these adjectives:
heavy and light; moist and dry
and these nouns:
cold and heat; cake and hands
First, make a mental note of what each of the eight words means to you on its own.

Now let’s put them in conventional pairs and see what picture appears in your mind. For me, it is different from the one generated by the word on its own and more interesting – sometimes creating a whole scene from my memory.

  • Heavy cold (my picture is of my dad in bed, sneezing)
  • Light rain (or drizzle – not enough to stop me from going out)
  • Moist cake (sounds tempting – mine is carrot cake)
  • Dry hands (maybe you need some moisturising cream)

Swap them around a bit and what do you get? Here are some examples:

  • Heavy rain (I’m not going out now, I’ll wait)
  • Moist hands (very nervous perhaps – certainly not tempting like the cake)
  • Dry cake (no thanks, I’ll have a biscuit)

Finally, I am going to suggest some less conventional pairs.

  • Moist cold
  • Dry rain
  • Light hands

Allow your imagination to lead you somewhere. What does dry rain suggest to you?

Put these adjectives with other words and see if you find any unusual pairings that make your imagination work a little harder and discover something new. I have been hearing a moist voice and a light whine. I’d probably prefer a light wine – in about half an hour I think.

Word matching like this can absorb otherwise unproductive moments in supermarket queues, traffic jams and vehicle marmalade. Enjoy!

Write Better Articles, Reports and Proposals in Half the Time | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

Write Better Articles, Reports and Proposals in Half the Time

This is a practical, step by step approach to writing any long document efficiently and getting a high quality result.

First, divide the job into manageable tasks and be realistic about how much time you have. There are four tasks:

1. Plan
2. Structure
3. Write
4. Check 

Divide your time into three parts, the first for tasks 1 and 2, the second for task 3 and the third for task 4. If, for example, you have to write something by the end of tomorrow and you have about four hours that you can devote to it, allocate a bit over an hour in total to planning and deciding on a suitable structure.
This set of articles will be presented in four parts: one for each task. Here is the first one.

Plan your Document

You are probably thinking that a third of your available time is too much to spend on planning. You are definitely not alone – but you can only test my “half the time” claim if you follow my all my suggestions at least once.
Planning splits into two parts:


1. Clarify the Brief
2. Organise your Material


Clarify the Brief

Reader
Ask yourself two important questions: who is going to read this, and why am I writing it? Think how much you know about your readers. You may know them personally or have never met them. You may know what their role is, which gives you some strong hints about what they are likely to know about already, what they are likely to need to know and what keeps them awake at night. There may be some internal politics you are aware of, or you may be able to hazard a guess about their likely reaction to the message you are about to convey. All of these snippets of information are useful, so jot them down.

Objective
Now think about your objective; your reason for writing this. Are you trying to win some new business; explaining something to a non-specialist; proposing a change to working practices in your organisation or writing an article to establish your expert status in a specific field? Ask yourself this:
What exactly is supposed to happen as a result of your reader(s) reading this? Be realistic about what a document can achieve – you probably won’t win the business as a result of your proposal, but it may get you short-listed. A document can’t change working practices but it might persuade someone to approve the budget.
You can only write a good document if you know who you are talking to and what you are trying to achieve. It is that simple. So, if you are vague about the answers to these questions, go and find out or make some sensible assumptions and write them down.

Organise your material

Think about what information you need in order to achieve your aim. This will almost certainly be different from what you happen to know about the subject. You may know more than you need in some areas and less in others. There are lots of good techniques for getting your head straight and putting some useful notes onto a single sheet of paper. Mind mapping is particularly valuable if you are on unfamiliar territory and have no idea where to start. No-one else needs to see your mind map, so make it as messy as it needs to be. If you are arguing for one course of action rather than another, force field analysis is very useful for getting both points of view lined up side by side. Use any technique you find useful (see Mind Tools for a good variety of thinking and planning techniques including both of the above), but please use something. The outcome should be some coherent, logical notes, not just a random brain dump.


The second part of the planning process is to select a structure that will deliver your message in a convincing way.

Select a Structure

The structure is the order in which you make your points to create a compelling story. The three structures described here are useful starting points but there are plenty of others, and do adapt them to suit your reader and your material.

Four Ps

I know every discipline seems to have its four Ps – well, here is mine. It is useful when you are putting forward your preferred solution to a recognised problem. Please note that the words beginning with P are guidelines for the content of the sections of your proposal, NOT headings.
Position – how things stand right now factually and without comment (how many people in team, gradual increase in the amount of work...)
Problem – why this state of affairs is not ideal (performance indicators not being met, low morale...)
Possibilities – discuss the pros and cons of several possible courses of action (don’t forget the “do nothing” option and its consequences)
Proposal – which of the options you prefer (and why if it is not already obvious).

AIDA

This is useful when you are persuading your readers to take some specific action such as come to an event, give you feedback or visit your website.
Attention – a heading or subject line that is relevant and interesting to your reader
Interest/involvement – a section that reels them in and convinces them that this is something they need to pay attention to
Details – now that they are listening, deliver the meat of your message
Action – tell them (or summarise, if you have already told them) exactly what action you require

Facts – Conclusions – Recommendations

Many regular monthly reports are written this way, but it is a flexible shape that lends itself well to financial analysis, letters of complaint, suggestions for courses of action and a whole array of other writing tasks.
First, keep to the facts, making sure you say nothing that your reader will have any justification for disagreeing with. Then build on them to provide your analysis, views, discussion and conclusions as appropriate, adding no information that wasn’t already introduced in the facts. Finally, base your recommendations on the conclusions and they will be convincing. How you split the information in the document should depend on how the reader will find it easiest to absorb. For example, you can have several sections with the facts, conclusions and recommendations logic repeated in each one. The key to making this structure work is to remember that every conclusion must be backed up by at least one fact and recommendations must lead out of the conclusions. So you finish up with a story along the lines of “these and these are how things are, which shows us this so we should do that.”
When you read an article that you find interesting and persuasive, take a moment to notice the structure of it. Give it a name and remember to adapt it for your own use when the time is right.

Write a Rough Draft

Now you are ready to start writing. You are ready because you have thought through what you need to say and how it is going to fit together, so you can put each section into words knowing what it needs to contain. My advice at this stage is to write as fast as you can, getting the ideas down according to your plan but not worrying at all about fine details. By this I mean that you can write unfinished or confusing sentences; leave out words you can’t think of; leave gaps for information you need to check; and ignore all the wiggly lines that the spelling and grammar checkers throw at you. Be careful that no-one persuades you to send it to them at this stage because it is still in its underwear and not at all ready to be seen. You can mark missing information and incomplete sentences with an otherwise unused symbol such as $$ if you are nervous about missing them later.

I suggest this behaviour for the following reasons:
1. It is more efficient to concentrate on a narrow range of mental activities at once. Get the content down roughly and in a sensible order now. The time for fine tuning is later – that’s why we have left a third of the time for checking.
2. If you stop whenever you are unhappy with a sentence and try to get it right immediately, you risk getting side-tracked and wasting time. You are much more likely to spot errors and see alternative ways to say things when some time has elapsed.
3. Once you have finished writing your document, you feel a sense of relief even though you know it is not perfect. You can relax just a little and move into a different gear, step back for a moment and admire your handiwork. If at all possible, leave it overnight at this point. If not, at least go and have a coffee or make a phone call – think about something different for a while.

I said get it all down as quickly as you can, but here are a few items you would be well advised to pay attention to at the writing stage.
Person
Decide before you start whether you are writing from your own or your company’s point of view using “I” or “we” (first person), talking about “the company” (third person) or avoiding all of these (see style below).
Tense
Is your subject matter to do with things that will still be true by the time your reader reads your words (as in: the earth is more or less spherical) or will they be in the past by then (as in: we have selected this methodology for its accuracy and ease of use).
Style
Do you want to come across as friendly, approachable and relaxed or do you need to sound formal, objective and correct? There is no right answer here – your answer should depend on what you are writing and who will read it. If you need to avoid “I” and “we” you may need to write in a passive style (as in: this action is recommended), rather than an active one (as in: we recommend that you take this action).

The items above can be very tedious to sort out at the checking stage because there are no “convert from passive to active” or “change to present tense” buttons on the word processor. So they are worth considering carefully, at the beginning of the writing stage.

Check Meticulously

Your document is written now but not ready, and there are several painstaking processes to be completed, so you will need every bit of that last third of your available time. Don’t skimp this step.
Checking is made up of two distinct activities:
Review
Check content; level of detail; accuracy of information; tone; appropriateness for the reader and the logical development of the story. Above all, does it meet the objective you set for it at the outset?
Proofread
Check spelling; grammar; missed or repeated words; consistency in use of capital letters, date formats and abbreviations. Make sure headings, sub-headings and bullets are consistently presented.
It is sensible review and proofread in that order. However, if you are incapable of ignoring a spelling mistake, as I am, you may need to get the proofreading out of the way first.

How to review thoroughly

If the document is long (over five pages) you will be well advised to use outline view in MS Word so that you can see your headings without the associated text and move chunks of text around easily. If you don’t have access to this function, I advise printing your document onto scrap paper so that you can flick through it and make notes – it’s very difficult to review thoroughly while scrolling through multiple pages on screen.
You should look at your document through the eyes of your reader. Will it make sense to them? Have you provided enough background information to help them to understand what this is about? Does it answer their question, provide compelling reasons for action, explain your point of view or whatever you were trying to do? Is it clear to them what they are supposed to do next? Be hard on yourself and be willing to take a whole chunk by the scruff of the neck and toss it out (this is why it was a good idea to write it quickly). Equally, be willing to add bits if you feel that your logic doesn’t flow. Do NOT fiddle with words and fine-tune sentence structures now, reviewing is about getting the ideas across to someone who starts from a different point of view from your own.

How to proofread thoroughly

Some parts of this job are best done on-screen, and for others you need to print the document out.

On-screen jobs
Spell check – very useful indeed but use your head as well. The spell checker will pick up words where your fingers got in a twist and ones you weren’t sure how to spell, but never accept a suggestion unless you are confident that it is right. Some of its ideas are bizarre in the extreme. If in doubt, use a dictionary. As online ones go, AskOxford is pretty good but remember to select ‘English dictionary’ not ‘entire site’.
Grammar check -- Trust yourself. Use the grammar checker to point out missed words and draw your attention to careless errors but don’t let it influence your style. Ignore comments about fragments and passives unless you are sure what they mean. Neither of these is necessarily wrong.
Sentence length -- Check your average sentence length – there are some instructions on another blog post  if you don’t know how. If your average is above 20, look for the longest sentences and break them into two. This is the most important action you can take to make sure that your writing is readable.
Find and replace -- If you think you may have used any abbreviations, spellings or capital letters inconsistently, find and replace is the most efficient way to iron this out. Never, ever click “replace all”, as it is sure to create a stupid error (such as a sentence beginning with a lower case letter) that you may not notice. Finally, search for your $$ symbol to make sure you have got rid of them all.

On paper jobs
Now print your document out, and settle down with a red pen and a cup of tea in a quiet place. Read slowly and carefully, line by line. You are not reading for sense, you are looking for errors the spell checker will have missed (‘from’ instead of ‘form’ for example), sentences that do not read right first time, bullets where the punctuation is inconsistent, brackets you forgot to close and minute detail of this kind.

I strongly recommend that you proofread the last page first, then the second last and so on, because:
1. This will prevent you from skim reading – which is a natural inclination
2. You will be freshest when checking the pages you wrote when you may have been becoming tired or bored.

 

8. A Great Idea for Teaching Staff | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

8. A Great Idea for Teaching Staff

Academic staff at a college find that Grammar To Go will help them with marking poorly written assignments from their students.

Tucked away in a corner of the staffroom at High Holme Sixth Form College, Paul, Amanda and I spent half an hour leafing through their students’ work files. Paul had been quite right: in almost every case, the students’ biggest let-down was their grammar, spelling and punctuation.
“The actual content is very good”, Paul sighed, “but I just know they’ll get marked down on their writing ability. And up until now, Amanda and I just haven’t had the time or the know-how to tackle it. Grammar was never a strong area of focus in our school days, either!”

As Paul made us all a cup of tea, I fired up my laptop. “I want to take you on a tour of Grammar to Go”, I explained to Amanda. Then you’ll be able to see just how easy and fast it is to reference grammar and spelling information.”

Showing the pair around Grammar to Go didn’t take long. Not for the first time, I felt extremely proud as I demonstrated how the website provides answers to all manner of issues – from spelling and punctuation through to tricky phraseology and grammatical syntax. Paul and Amanda loved the ‘Personal Answers’ area, and when I explained how the site could be used as a self-study guide, I knew that this was the answer they were looking for.

“This is a double-whammy, Jane! Not only is it going to make our lives easier – correcting and tutoring our students on any errors – but the study guide will make their lives easier, too. If they just take the time to work through the section, they’d find their own writing improving in no time at all!”
“You bet they would. And a licence for the college – or even just for your History Department – would mean that you could run Grammar to Go on your internal computers. How many computers do you have in the college library?”
“Ten – that’s right, isn’t it, Amanda?”

The trainee teacher nodded. “Our students use those computers for research, mainly – they type up their essays at home. Of course, we couldn’t possibly give each student their own Grammar to Go log-in for home use, but a college log-in would mean that they could work through the tutorials and do any checking they need to during their free periods. And Paul and I can use Grammar to Go either before or after school – which means we get our marking done before we head off home!”

I smiled at the two teachers. “Sounds like a good solution... so, where do we go from here?”
“The college principal”, frowned Paul. “Trouble is, he’s a hard man to get hold of... and he’s very conservative with college spending. I’m not sure how we’ll convince him of this...”

9. Why is it Important to Punctuate Right? | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

9. Why is it Important to Punctuate Right?

A student is persuaded that grammar and punctuation matter.

When I was studying for my ‘O’ levels at school, I don’t recall giving grammar a second thought. Maybe that’s because my classmates and I had had grammar instilled into us from a very early age: from parents, friends of parents, and of course from our teachers. Whatever the subject – be it history, geography, physics or biology – spelling, punctuation and grammatical syntax were of primary importance, so it’s not surprising that our essays read exceedingly well.

Of course, this is a few years ago now (just one or two!), and education has changed its focus quite dramatically. So listening to Paul’s students talking about their own concerns was really interesting.
“I get why it’s important, but isn’t the content even more important?” piped up one of Paul’s upper sixth history students over lunch that day.
“Content is vital, Jade, but it’s irrelevant if it’s misunderstood.”
“What d’you mean?”

I pulled a plastic folder out of my bag. “OK, take a look at this”, I replied, sliding a piece of paper across the lunch table. “The same short paragraph has been typed out four times, but the grammar or punctuation has been changed on each one. Tell me what you think.”
The girl read the paragraphs to herself. Slowly, a smile began to spread across her young face.
“They mean different things, Miss!”
“You’re right”, I laughed. “And that’s what I was getting at...”
“Miss, I want to work in media. Films, TV and so on. But everything there’s spoken, not written, isn’t it? So is it important for me?”
“Well, you want to get into college to study media, don’t you?”
“Yep!”

“And you’ll have to take exams in order to get the grades you need... no doubt the college you go to will ask you to write essays... and when you eventually get a job in a production or media agency, you’ll have to work on all sorts of projects, from providing briefs for suppliers, through to writing and sending emails to contacts. If you can’t make yourself understood...”

“I get it, I get it!”
“So, Miss... this Go to Grammar thing...”
“Grammar To Go, George!”
“Yeah... well, it’s quick is it?”
“As lightening! Or, truthfully, as quick as your broadband connection.”
“And I won’t never have to use any dictionary?”
“You won’t ever have to use a dictionary, Jill. And you won’t ever have a reason to make a mistake again! Want to take a look? My laptop has wi-fi...”
“Yeah, that’d be great!”

10. A boon to Local Colleges across the Area? | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

10. A boon to Local Colleges across the Area?

The case is made for Grammar to Go to be introduced to the sixth form colleges across a local authority's area.

It was nearing the end of my day at High Holme Sixth Form College. Paul, Amanda and I had spent time discussing the ways in which Grammar to Go could make a huge difference at the college: helping the tutors to coach their students to better use of grammar, and helping the students themselves in their essay-writing.

I had also spent time with some of Paul’s students, showing them around the Grammar to Go website, introducing them to some of the functionality. They seemed impressed, and were convinced that this would be a useful tool for them.

My final port of call before heading home was to the Headmaster’s office. Dr. Quinn had cleared half an hour for me in his diary at 5pm. According to Paul, he was interested to hear all about my service – and what his students had thought of it.
“Come in, Jane: please take a seat.” Dr. Quinn ushered me into his office. I sat down in a large armchair opposite him. Dividing us was a large wooden desk, overflowing with folders, trays of papers and a stack of unopened mail.
“Apologies for asking to see you so late in the day… as you can see, I’ve rather a lot on my plate at the minute”, explained Dr. Quinn. “You’ll be aware of OFSTED, no doubt? We are due to be visited next week, and I have a mountain of paperwork to complete before then…”
“Please, I fully understand… I imagine it’s an awful lot to get through.”
Dr. Quinn sighed. “It certainly is… on top of all my day-to-day work, too! Now then… you’ve spent a day talking to the students and to our tutors – about a grammar-checking service, is that correct?”

I explained to Dr. Quinn all about Grammar to Go, and the outcome of my day at the college. At the end of my update, the headmaster leaned back in his chair and crossed his arms.
“Jane, it sounds like a wonderful service, but I’m not sure it’s something I could allow. Admittedly, £15 is not a great expense, but I can’t help feel that we’d be spoon-feeding our students. After all, when they get out in the working world, they’re not going to have ready access to this, are they?”
“No – but what they learn from using it here will stay with them after they leave. Think of it as an extension of your educational process…”

Dr. Quinn folded his arms. “That’s a valid point. But consider the case I’m going to have to make to the Local Authority. In their eyes, why should they fund a marginal improvement in the educational offering of college over the one down the road?”
“Then there’s the value to your tutors…”
“… and why should the Authority fund a brief improvement to their working life?”
“… and then there’s the difference it could make to your day, Dr. Quinn. These OFSTED reports you mentioned: they don’t write themselves, I’ll bet. Grammar to Go will cut the time you spend on them – and will make your presentation style and readability all the better. What’s more, it will help to improve your credibility, and that of the college.”

“Once again, Jane, it’s back to that favouritism thing. Why should our Local Authority want to give preferential treatment to High Holme Sixth Form College?”
Dr. Quinn had a point.
“Okay… so what if we were to talk to the Authority about rolling this out across all of the local colleges?”

A smile spread slowly across the headmaster’s face.
“Now that might just be a way in. Let me see if I can find a contact phone number for you...”

Who or Whom? | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

Who or Whom?

If you are ever unsure whether you should use 'who' or 'whom', the full answer is here. But the real truth is that most of the time you're OK if you go with what sounds right to you.

Given that around 98% of us often use ‘who’ and ‘whom’ wrong when we are talking, it’s comforting to know that a slip-up won’t actually change the meaning of your sentence. In speech, ‘who’ generally sounds better – even when ‘whom’ is actually more grammatically accurate.
When it comes to the written word, however, it’s useful to know how to check what is strictly correct.

You should use ‘who’ when referring to the subject of a sentence, and ‘whom’ when referring to the object. To help with this, think of ‘he’ (subject) and ‘him’ (object). Like the word ‘whom’, the object ‘him’ ends with m. If your sentence would sound better with ‘he’ rather than ‘him’, use ‘who’ .

Try using this rule in practice today. Let’s start off with a question:
“If you could meet anyone, who would you meet?”
How would you answer that question? “Brad Pitt: I would meet he” – or “Brad Pitt: I would meet him.”
The second version sounds better, doesn’t it? – “Brad Pitt: I would meet him.” That means that our question above should have used ‘whom’, because the pronoun we will be using is ‘him’. So our question should actually read “If you could meet anyone, whom would you meet?” You probably thought it sounded fine though, didn’t you?

Now try these:
1. [Who / whom] is coming for tea?
2. I liked the juror, [who / whom] we spoke to at length.
3. My son’s teacher, [who / whom] helped him through his exams

Answers:
1. Who is coming for tea? – He is coming for tea.
2. I liked the juror, whom we spoke to at length. – We spoke to him at length.
3. My son’s teacher, who helped him through his exams – He helped my son.

Does that make sense? If not, comment below and we will try to make it clearer. Remember, using ‘whom’ does quite often sound strange and old-fashioned, even in writing and when it is correct. If you are writing something quite informal, just go with what sounds best.

For more tips like this, visit the home page of Grammar to Go and sign up for “17 Days to Better Grammar”

Conquer the Commas | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

Conquer the Commas

Commas and semi-colons confuse the best of us. Here is some useful advice.

The comma (,) and the semicolon (;) are two of the most mis-used punctuation marks in our language. This is partly because using them wrongly doesn’t usually change the meaning of the sentence – it just interferes with its clarity. Fortunately, there are some simple rules that should help you decide which is the most appropriate in a particular sentence.

Commas are typically used to separate a number of items that appear next to each other in a sentence:

  • I’d like eggs, bacon, toast, juice and coffee for breakfast.
  • My father is old, infirm and forgetful these days
  • We hopped, skipped and jumped our way to the beach

Notice how the final two words in the list are separated by the word ‘and’ rather than a comma.

Commas are also used when you want to join two short sentences together to make one longer one. Take these two as an example:

1. It was a cold night.
2. I longed for a hot bath.

These two sentences can be linked by a comma and the word ‘and’:

It was a cold night, and I longed for a hot bath.

This reads well, and when spoken, it sounds right, too. But what if we lose the word ‘and’?

It was a cold night, I longed for a hot bath

Suddenly it doesn’t sound so good, and it is grammatically wrong (technically known as a 'run-on' sentence in case that interests you). Replace the comma with a semicolon, however, and we’re back on track:

It was a cold night; I longed for a hot bath

Here's another example:

1. All of the films sounded good.
2. We couldn’t decide which to watch.

With the comma, we need to add 'so' or 'and':

All of the films sounded good, so we couldn’t decide which to watch

With the semicolon, we can leave it out:

All of the films sounded good; we couldn’t decide which to watch.

If you want more details and different types of commas, get a month's worth of the full Grammar to Go service for £15

Make the Context Clear to your Reader | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

Make the Context Clear to your Reader

Confessions of an ambiguous writer! A misunderstanding caused by using a vague all-purpose word instead of choosing a clear one.

Here is a little cautionary tale – every word of it true.

I try to practise what I preach, and to make my written messages as clear as possible – but I am, alas, subject to lapses and am a mere mortal. I make mistakes – like this one. I sent a message via LinkedIn to Stephen, a very talented marketing consultant, about his current video editing project. The message was flippant, but I know him well enough to be sure he would not object. After his reply, I wrote this:

I am interested that you do this. I will be doing a video interview before long – what are your three top tips for avoiding catatonic boredom?

He took the trouble to reply with three thoughtful tips about doing (as in filming and editing) a video interview whereas I meant doing (as in being filmed and interviewed) a video interview. I was embarrassed to have written in such an ambiguous way.

The lesson I need to learn is this:

Think about what your readers know about and are involved with. Read your message with their eyes, and make sure it will be as clear to them as it is to you.
Of course Stephen was going to be thinking about the editing side of the process – it’s what he is concerned with right now.  Pay attention to all-purpose words like 'doing', 'having' and 'being' because they are likely to allow alternative interpretations of what you have written.

Context and Communication | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

Context and Communication

How I learned the hard way to think about context and choosing the right medium - there's plenty of choice!

I love Twitter. A group of us from all over the world who are interested in language and words often send each other links and comments about language use. We also try to get useful tips out to others who use writing without thinking about it so much.

As you may know, Twitter messages are restricted to 140 characters – not words, characters. So there is no room for waffle or introductory fluff. And confusions can arise – like this:

I received a tweet from Anne Hickley (her Twitter ID is @anne_penguin), someone I have communicated with happily for a few months. It said

@janepenson (my twitter identity) "Please contact me ..."?

So, I looked up her last email with her phone number on it and gave her a call. I also tweeted to say I had left a phone message. She was very confused, tweeted that she had not asked me to contact her and wondered if I had muddled her up with someone else. Since she is represented on Twitter by a very distinctive penguin, I was absolutely sure it was her – so, I went back to her tweet and quoted the exact time and date. Then she saw what had happened.

A day or so earlier, there had been a Twitter ‘conversation’ running about alternative ways of saying “Do not hesitate to contact me if I can be of any further assistance”. Suggestions included: “Let me know if I can help” and “Feel free to contact me if I can help”. Anne was adding to this with her suggestion, but by now (all of 22 hours later) it was out of context and I didn’t make the connection. Life moves on very fast when you tweet.

This is a small example of what happens when any kind of written communication, definitely including emails, is sent without explaining enough context to help the reader to know who you are and what you are talking about. Between us we probably wasted at least 15 minutes trying to unravel this mystery. Multiply that minor misunderstanding by all of the carelessly written emails, texts and tweets that are sent every day in most businesses and you have a big pile of wasted time and frustration.  There are a couple of lessons to be learned here.

Ask yourself before you write:

1. Is the context clear?
Will your reader know who you are and what the context of your message is?

2. Are you using the right medium?
If we had emailed, we would probably have unravelled this sooner. Use Twitter for little one-off messages, links to interesting websites and comments that require no reply, but don’t rely on it for a two-way conversation – it’s a bit like shouting into a storm and hoping the first cousin of your postman’s daughter will hear you.

Also, Twitter is a very transitory medium where threads of conversation are not obvious. This led to our confusion – I forgot the discussion from the previous day and Anne forgot that she had commented. So – we are certainly both forgetful, but we have also learned something about how to and how not to use Twitter.

Beware of Negatives | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals

Beware of Negatives

Start with a negative at your peril! You may be writing something you didn't mean at all.

Look at this sentence:

I didn’t pay her a compliment because she is my sister.

Does this mean that you didn’t pay a compliment to your sister, or that you did pay her a compliment but for a reason other than your relationship with her?

Misunderstandings of this kind are common when sentences begin with a negative statement. This thought provoking one is attributed to a writer and comedian called Alan Whitney Brown.

I am not a vegetarian because ... (you are probably expecting something about it being natural to eat animals or that you would miss a juicy steak too much). In fact you get this elegant reversal:

I am not a vegetarian because I love animals; I am a vegetarian because I hate plants.

Beware of negatives – or enjoy their possibilities – but whatever you do, make sure your meaning is clear when you need it to be.

But Protection | Grammar to Go - The official grammar site for business professionals